Improvement of the peri-implant phenotype
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The gingival phenotype has a direct relationship with the survival of the dental implant and the maintenance of periodontal health. In the present clinical case, a dental implant with an autologous free connective tissue graft was installed in order to improve the thin gingival phenotype that the case presented. The lateral palate was chosen as the donor area because it provides clinical results similar to the tuberosity, but it is the one with the best availability. The de-epithelialized free connective graft surgical technique chosen for the donor area provides a denser, more stable tissue with less contraction, as shown in the clinical case with a 13-month follow-up. According to the clinical case and the scientific bases consulted, it can be concluded that the simultaneous treatment of dental implants and the improvement of the gingival phenotype contributes to a more favorable peri-implant health, contributing to a significantly lower marginal bone loss.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Singh K, Rao J, Afsheen T, Tiwari B. Survival rate of dental implant placement by conventional or flapless surgery in controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic review. Indian J Dent Res. agosto de 2019;30(4):600-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_606_17
Canellas JVDS, Medeiros PJD, Figueredo CM da S, Fischer RG, Ritto FG. Which is the best choice after tooth extraction, immediate implant placement or delayed placement with alveolar ridge preservation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. noviembre de 2019;47(11):1793-802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.08.004
Bittner N, Schulze-Späte U, Silva C, Da Silva JD, Kim DM, Tarnow D, et al. Changes of the alveolar ridge dimension and gingival recession associated with implant position and tissue phenotype with immediate implant placement: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(4):469-80.
Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Mendonça G, Ou A, Chan H-L, Mailoa J, Suárez-López Del Amo F, et al. Impact of mucosal phenotype on marginal bone levels around tissue level implants: A prospective controlled trial. J Periodontol. junio de 2021;92(6):771-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.20-0458
Lin G-H, Curtis DA, Kapila Y, Velasquez D, Kan JYK, Tahir P, et al. The significance of surgically modifying soft tissue phenotype around fixed dental prostheses: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review. Journal of Periodontology [Internet]. 2020 [citado 29 de noviembre de 2021];91(3):339-51. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/JPER.19-0310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0310
Puzio M, Hadzik J, Błaszczyszyn A, Gedrange T, Dominiak M. Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants with connective tissue graft (CTG) and xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM). 1-year randomized control trail. Ann Anat. julio de 2020;230:151484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151484
Lissek M, Boeker M, Happe A. How Thick Is the Oral Mucosa around Implants after Augmentation with Different Materials: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Substitute Matrices in Comparison to Connective Tissue Grafts. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 17 de julio de 2020 [citado 29 de noviembre de 2021];21(14):5043. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7404037/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145043
Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Pustiglioni FE, Chambrone LA, Lima LA. Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects? J Dent. septiembre de 2008;36(9):659-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.05.007
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang H-L. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. enero de 2021;92(1):21-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0716
Sanz-Martín I, Rojo E, Maldonado E, Stroppa G, Nart J, Sanz M. Structural and histological differences between connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palatal mucosa or from the tuberosity area. Clin Oral Investig. febrero de 2019;23(2):957-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2516-9
Maino GNE, Valles C, Santos A, Pascual A, Esquinas C, Nart J. Influence of suturing technique on wound healing and patient morbidity after connective tissue harvesting. A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. agosto de 2018;45(8):977-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12960
Ramos-Pilco E, Salinas YC, Alarcón MA. Paladar o Tuberosidad, ¿Cuál es la Mejor Zona Donadora para un Injerto de Tejido Blando?: Una Revisión Sistemática. Int J Odontostomat [Internet]. diciembre de 2020 [citado 30 de noviembre de 2021];14(4):602-9. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2020000400602&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-381X2020000400602
Solderer A, Kaufmann M, Hofer D, Wiedemeier D, Attin T, Schmidlin PR. Efficacy of chlorhexidine rinses after periodontal or implant surgery: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. enero de 2019;23(1):21-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2761-y
Hutton CG, Johnson GK, Barwacz CA, Allareddy V, Avila-Ortiz G. Comparison of two different surgical approaches to increase peri-implant mucosal thickness: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. julio de 2018;89(7):807-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0597
Rojo E, Stroppa G, Sanz-Martin I, Gonzalez-Martín O, Alemany AS, Nart J. Soft tissue volume gain around dental implants using autogenous subepithelial connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palate or tuberosity area. A randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. abril de 2018;45(4):495-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12869
Ripoll S, Fernández de Velasco-Tarilonte Á, Bullón B, Ríos-Carrasco B, Fernández-Palacín A. Complications in the Use of Deepithelialized Free Gingival Graft vs. Connective Tissue Graft: A One-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 23 de abril de 2021 [citado 30 de noviembre de 2021];18(9):4504. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8123082/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094504